Thursday, October 30, 2014

The Quake That Stopped the Battle

The Quake That Stopped the Battle
 


In October of 1989, two clans came from opposing sides of the water, meeting in a series that would determine supremacy. Supremacy of the Oakland-San Francisco Bay area, that is. The Oakland Athletics and the San Francisco Giants faced off in the World Series, and the series had been labeled the Battle of the Bay. But this event is much less remembered for the sports than it is for the terror that struck San Francisco. Following the end of the Series, there was a new nickname for the matchup, The Earthquake Series. Because before Game Three began, a city vibrant with orange and green turned into a crumbled city in a matter of seconds.



San Francisco was not ready for an earthquake, and the results (which will be discussed later) showed. The city had already been the location of one of the greatest natural disasters in the history of the United States, the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake. But since that point in time, no major or even semi-major earthquake effected the city. The earthquake was, as David Schwartz, a USGS geologist says, “a wake-up call for this region.” People believed that the San Andreas Fault was no longer a threat due to its length of quietness and calmness. There were no extremely strong and strict building codes. The available machines for earthquake prevention and determining were not in abundance. Perhaps the most shocking thing is that this lack of preparation for this disaster was not as greatly emphasized as it could have been because the epicenter was almost 60 miles away.

 
 


 
 
The Loma Prieta earthquake had a magnitude of 6.9, which was less than the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake (7.8 on the Richter Scale). It only lasted about 12 seconds, but that was more than enough time for it to cause massive destruction across the city of San Francisco and other parts of California. Although there were only 63 casualties of the quake, it left 3757 others injured. Monetarily, the quake delivered damage costs upwards of $6 billion. Of all the structures most hurt by the earthquake, the most badly damaged were the older structures, including the Cypress Street Viaduct and the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Closer to the epicenter of the disaster, the quake resulted in more than 1,000 landslides. The quake could be felt as far away as western Nevada. Power outages, though much less of a tragic effect, covered most of the surrounding areas. The quake even stopped the World Series for ten days.
 
 
 
 



One of the biggest reasons that this earthquake was much more devastating than it should have been was because of the architectural state and planning of San Franciscan buildings. At the time of the quake, there were no strict and demanding rules targeting earthquake safety. Today, each building is built and reinforced with earthquake-sustaining techniques and guidelines. The bridges have all been reinforced to much greater tolerations. One example of this is the Bay Bridge, which actually had one whole stretch of road collapse during the earthquake. This bridge is now reinforced so that it can (supposedly) withstand any of the earthquakes that will challenge it in the next 1500 years. Although earthquake prediction is still rather difficult, San Francisco and the surrounding areas have much more help on their side for future events. There are now over 200 geographical sensors planted, many more than the small amount of 75 that existed at the time of the earthquake.
 
 
Although it does have more preparations than before, San Francisco is still far from being fully protected and ready for another earthquake. And unfortunately, the only way for San Francisco to really know whether it is well prepared or not is to have it face another earthquake.

 
 
Here are two detailed sources about this event:
 
 
Here is a live broadcast that occurred during the earthquake:
(Best if watched beginning at 2:19)


Thursday, October 16, 2014

Oh, All the Places Films Go

Oh, All the Places Films Go


One hundred years ago, moving pictures were still a relatively new form of media that were just starting to catch on. However, the idea of sending a finished film from country to country for viewing was not encouraged. The film that cameras used is very fragile, easy to damage, and susceptible to burning. But today, releasing films internationally is very common. Almost every film made today is digital, therefore lessening the problems that actual film brought. There is no physical copy that can be damaged by being held improperly and they will not spontaneously combust. The real reason, though, for the increase in international releases has to do with the expensive budgets of today’s films. The average budget of a film is $70 million. This is why films are sent across the world: to make money.


The globalization of the film industry is a long process, and there are two reasons for why it was so important. First, film festivals and awards ceremonies began opening there competition to all film markets. For example, the Academy Awards (Oscars) did not feature an award for Best Foreign Language Film until 1956, at the 29th Oscars. This development has mainly targeted the critical acclaim aspect of a film’s success. This development has also brought box office success, but it is not the driving force. Second, other countries wanted to see Hollywood films. This is where the full-blown money aspect comes from. Hollywood studios realized that this was a way for films to make an even bigger profit, leaving more money left over after the humongous budget was paid off.


As a comparison, here are two ways that globalization has affected the outcome of film’s success. The first example is Avatar (2009), an American film directed by James Cameron. This film is the highest grossing film of all time without adjusted inflation. It had (roughly) a $237 million budget. Worldwide, Avatar made over 10 times its budget, finishing its theatrical run with $2,787,965,087. It was shown on over 14,000 movie screens across the world. In the U.S. and Canada, is grossed a little over $760 million. However, the other $2 billion dollars in box office revenue came from international theatres.


The second example is Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon (2000), a Taiwanese film directed by Ang Lee. Ang Lee is a Taiwanese film director who has received widespread acclaim for many of his films, many of which were released in English, rather than his native language. Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon was also produced by China, Hong Kong, and the United States. Upon its release and in the following aftermath, Crouching Tiger achieved two things. First, the critical acclaim that was a desire first introduced in the mid-1900s. This film was a monumental success among critics. It won numerous awards and was placed in many critics Top 10 lists for films of 2000. At the Oscars, it won four awards: Best Foreign Language Film, Best Art Direction, Best Cinematography, and Best Original Score. It was even nominated for both Best Picture and Best Director (Ang Lee). Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon also accomplished the Hollywood section of globalization, box office success. The success of this film was not expected, especially the public reception in the United States. Crouching Tiger actually grossed more money in the North America than it did in all other international venues combined. The final statistics are $128,078,872 in North America and $85,446,864 internationally for a combined $213,525,736 box office catch.


Here are some articles on this information:

Here is a video that addresses Hollywood's attempts at garnering success in foreign markets:
(This video is most relevant from 1:00-1:30)